Will the taxpayer be re-imbursed? (From Warrington Guardian)

• "You will also find it was the previous administration that hired Mr Farrall, when as grey_man says they should have blocked his appointment or considered him an unsuitable candidate on his previous track record alone.
  Why do you think Tony Fox that those most stridently defending Mr Farrall in the face of the factually real concerns of Helen Jones, the five Labour councillors and the rest of us, are Lib Dem Councillors, namely Bob Barr and Ian Marks? For them to later agree Helen Jones et al were right would be tantamount to admitting the Lib Cons were wrong with their original selection.
  You are right in saying Mr Farrall is unfit for purpose. But since the Lib Con administration voted him his 9% rise with added benefits in 2009, their successors had no power to rescind that decision. That unfortunately is the way our local government procedures work. So it is the Lib Cons you should be putting your questions to."
• * Your name This field is mandatory
• * Your email This field is mandatory
• Reason

  Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.

• 
  Enter the above word in the box below
  
  

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.