Warrington pictures needed for dementia ward

Warrington Guardian: Warrington pictures needed for dementia ward Warrington pictures needed for dementia ward

BUDDING photographers could see their work on the walls of Warrington Hospital.

Pictures are needed for the new dementia ward and hospital bosses are looking for Warrington scenes to brighten the walls and evoke memories.

The pictures can be landscapes, landmarks, flowers, animals, streams and woods and staff are also keen on pictures from 1940s onwards, in particular buildings that might not be in existence today.

The deadline is Friday, March 14 and pictures can be e-mailed to communications@whh.nhs.uk.

Comments (8)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:50am Sun 2 Feb 14

MAD 4 IT says...

page a & nick tessla need to send their FACE photos in if the camera lense doesnt CRACK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
page a & nick tessla need to send their FACE photos in if the camera lense doesnt CRACK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! MAD 4 IT

11:52am Sun 2 Feb 14

old-codger says...

MAD 4 IT wrote:
page a & nick tessla need to send their FACE photos in if the camera lense doesnt CRACK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!
You need to get a grip on yourself MAD 4 IT, There is a difference between intelligent conversation and downright bigotry,
[quote][p][bold]MAD 4 IT[/bold] wrote: page a & nick tessla need to send their FACE photos in if the camera lense doesnt CRACK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ![/p][/quote]You need to get a grip on yourself MAD 4 IT, There is a difference between intelligent conversation and downright bigotry, old-codger

12:25pm Sun 2 Feb 14

Brick Bazooka says...

Naughty WG!

That golden gates photo is copyrighted. FAQ on photographers website reads:

Who owns the copyright of the photographs?
The copyright of the photographs always remains with the photographer, however I will give you all the photographs taken at your event on a disc to be used however you please as long as its not for commercial purposes.
Naughty WG! That golden gates photo is copyrighted. FAQ on photographers website reads: Who owns the copyright of the photographs? The copyright of the photographs always remains with the photographer, however I will give you all the photographs taken at your event on a disc to be used however you please as long as its not for commercial purposes. Brick Bazooka

12:02am Mon 3 Feb 14

muckerman says...

Be careful if you take pictures of/around Golden Square. Security staff will confront you and be very aggressive.
Be careful if you take pictures of/around Golden Square. Security staff will confront you and be very aggressive. muckerman

8:06am Mon 3 Feb 14

Nick Tessla says...

old-codger wrote:
MAD 4 IT wrote:
page a & nick tessla need to send their FACE photos in if the camera lense doesnt CRACK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


!
You need to get a grip on yourself MAD 4 IT, There is a difference between intelligent conversation and downright bigotry,
I tend to feel it is a compliment that someone like MAD 4 IT (and certain other posters) feels such dislike at my ability to make rational comments, while they can only resort to abuse.

They say you can judge a man by the company he chooses - sometimes you can judge him by those he infuriates.
[quote][p][bold]old-codger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]MAD 4 IT[/bold] wrote: page a & nick tessla need to send their FACE photos in if the camera lense doesnt CRACK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ![/p][/quote]You need to get a grip on yourself MAD 4 IT, There is a difference between intelligent conversation and downright bigotry,[/p][/quote]I tend to feel it is a compliment that someone like MAD 4 IT (and certain other posters) feels such dislike at my ability to make rational comments, while they can only resort to abuse. They say you can judge a man by the company he chooses - sometimes you can judge him by those he infuriates. Nick Tessla

11:44am Mon 3 Feb 14

fedster says...

the photo has all the details of the photographer and his company hence why its been used no doubt theirs some agreement or its on of those already sent it.

as most armatures and professionals tag their work in this day and age of the interweb people steal images to save money.
the photo has all the details of the photographer and his company hence why its been used no doubt theirs some agreement or its on of those already sent it. as most armatures and professionals tag their work in this day and age of the interweb people steal images to save money. fedster

2:12pm Mon 3 Feb 14

muckerman says...

Nick Tessla wrote:
old-codger wrote:
MAD 4 IT wrote:
page a & nick tessla need to send their FACE photos in if the camera lense doesnt CRACK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



!
You need to get a grip on yourself MAD 4 IT, There is a difference between intelligent conversation and downright bigotry,
I tend to feel it is a compliment that someone like MAD 4 IT (and certain other posters) feels such dislike at my ability to make rational comments, while they can only resort to abuse.

They say you can judge a man by the company he chooses - sometimes you can judge him by those he infuriates.
Bit of an over reaction to what seems only to be friendly banter or just MAD4IT's poor attempt at humour :)) .
Nick, with regard to your "ability to make rational comments" ???
I see you more self indulging in one-upmanship and trying to be a smarty pants rather than offering any proper arguments or comments on any of the related topics I’ve seen you post around here.
I have to say though I have not read all your babbling's (I do have a life) so I could be wrong - but the few comments I have read of yours have more of an emphasis on ridiculing people who take the time to give their views (sometimes naive, sometime poor humour) just for the sake of it. Ridiculing individuals instead of taking part in any relevant discussion and airing your own views on matters looks to me like insecurity on your behalf.
[quote][p][bold]Nick Tessla[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]old-codger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]MAD 4 IT[/bold] wrote: page a & nick tessla need to send their FACE photos in if the camera lense doesnt CRACK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ![/p][/quote]You need to get a grip on yourself MAD 4 IT, There is a difference between intelligent conversation and downright bigotry,[/p][/quote]I tend to feel it is a compliment that someone like MAD 4 IT (and certain other posters) feels such dislike at my ability to make rational comments, while they can only resort to abuse. They say you can judge a man by the company he chooses - sometimes you can judge him by those he infuriates.[/p][/quote]Bit of an over reaction to what seems only to be friendly banter or just MAD4IT's poor attempt at humour :)) . Nick, with regard to your "ability to make rational comments" ??? I see you more self indulging in one-upmanship and trying to be a smarty pants rather than offering any proper arguments or comments on any of the related topics I’ve seen you post around here. I have to say though I have not read all your babbling's (I do have a life) so I could be wrong - but the few comments I have read of yours have more of an emphasis on ridiculing people who take the time to give their views (sometimes naive, sometime poor humour) just for the sake of it. Ridiculing individuals instead of taking part in any relevant discussion and airing your own views on matters looks to me like insecurity on your behalf. muckerman

2:27pm Mon 3 Feb 14

Nick Tessla says...

muckerman wrote:
Nick Tessla wrote:
old-codger wrote:
MAD 4 IT wrote:
page a & nick tessla need to send their FACE photos in if the camera lense doesnt CRACK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




!
You need to get a grip on yourself MAD 4 IT, There is a difference between intelligent conversation and downright bigotry,
I tend to feel it is a compliment that someone like MAD 4 IT (and certain other posters) feels such dislike at my ability to make rational comments, while they can only resort to abuse.

They say you can judge a man by the company he chooses - sometimes you can judge him by those he infuriates.
Bit of an over reaction to what seems only to be friendly banter or just MAD4IT's poor attempt at humour :)) .
Nick, with regard to your "ability to make rational comments" ???
I see you more self indulging in one-upmanship and trying to be a smarty pants rather than offering any proper arguments or comments on any of the related topics I’ve seen you post around here.
I have to say though I have not read all your babbling's (I do have a life) so I could be wrong - but the few comments I have read of yours have more of an emphasis on ridiculing people who take the time to give their views (sometimes naive, sometime poor humour) just for the sake of it. Ridiculing individuals instead of taking part in any relevant discussion and airing your own views on matters looks to me like insecurity on your behalf.
The irony
[quote][p][bold]muckerman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Nick Tessla[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]old-codger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]MAD 4 IT[/bold] wrote: page a & nick tessla need to send their FACE photos in if the camera lense doesnt CRACK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ![/p][/quote]You need to get a grip on yourself MAD 4 IT, There is a difference between intelligent conversation and downright bigotry,[/p][/quote]I tend to feel it is a compliment that someone like MAD 4 IT (and certain other posters) feels such dislike at my ability to make rational comments, while they can only resort to abuse. They say you can judge a man by the company he chooses - sometimes you can judge him by those he infuriates.[/p][/quote]Bit of an over reaction to what seems only to be friendly banter or just MAD4IT's poor attempt at humour :)) . Nick, with regard to your "ability to make rational comments" ??? I see you more self indulging in one-upmanship and trying to be a smarty pants rather than offering any proper arguments or comments on any of the related topics I’ve seen you post around here. I have to say though I have not read all your babbling's (I do have a life) so I could be wrong - but the few comments I have read of yours have more of an emphasis on ridiculing people who take the time to give their views (sometimes naive, sometime poor humour) just for the sake of it. Ridiculing individuals instead of taking part in any relevant discussion and airing your own views on matters looks to me like insecurity on your behalf.[/p][/quote]The irony Nick Tessla

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree