Council targets the vulnerable (From Warrington Guardian)
Text us your news! Start your message Warrington News and send any photos or videos to 80360
Council targets the vulnerable
3:57pm Wednesday 13th March 2013 in Letters
WHY does this council see the need to consider withdrawing transport for special needs children to travel to and from school in a safe manner? I
It appears from many articles in the Guardian that the elderly, infirm and those needing extra help are the first in line to be affected when cuts are to be made.
What about a salary cut for all those in the council employ earning more than £35,000?
All the cuts will be blamed on the current Government and not on the Labour council hitting those in need.
Warrington Borough Transport, now Network Warrington, is owned by the council according to the Network Warrington website, as a limited company.
Recent weeks have seen many full page adverts in the Guardian for them, at what cost?
Approval of the ‘20 is Plenty Scheme’ is another total waste of money caused through the signage that will be involved.
We have had many road alterations that have caused more trouble than cures, such as the ridiculous road signage at Bridge Foot which underwent further painting not long after.
Surely that money would be better spent on services for the vulnerable? There are many areas in this town where money can be saved without hitting those who can’t fight back.
These children in particular need that transport for their safety and that of their parents and carers.
GEORGE F MCKIE
Great Sankey
Comments(6)
SAC_in_Warrington
says...
1:45pm Mon 18 Mar 13
pognoogle
says...
8:37pm Wed 20 Mar 13
SAC_in_Warrington
says...
8:51pm Wed 20 Mar 13
pognoogle wrote:There are very tight restrictions when using a motability car especially on a limited amount of milage.
If the overpaid fatcats in every government/council body were to stop claiming expenses for petrol, or chauffeur driven cars, or even thinking they're entitled to a company car then that money could be spent on providing services that are more required. I understand that some people take the mick when claiming motablility allowance for cars and then are using those cars for their work/life instead of for transporting their kids to and from school AND then expecting a transport service; but if that was to be clarified and looked at properly, then this could probably be sorted.
moleogod
says...
11:37am Fri 22 Mar 13
SAC_in_Warrington
says...
12:01pm Fri 22 Mar 13
silverlady54 says...
2:04pm Sun 17 Mar 13