Tony Smith believes Leeds Rhinos' disallowed try did not help Warrington Wolves lift the Challenge Cup trophy

Smith disagreed with the idea that Leeds' disallowed try helped Wolves win the game. Pictures by Mike Boden Smith disagreed with the idea that Leeds' disallowed try helped Wolves win the game. Pictures by Mike Boden

WOLVES boss Tony Smith has dismissed the idea that Leeds’ disallowed try at the start of the second half changed the outcome of the Challenge Cup final.

Brett Delaney slid over on 42 minutes for a try that would have taken Leeds into the lead after Kylie Leuluai’s huge hit on Brett Hodgson had dislodged the ball, only for the referee to confuse everyone in the stadium by awarding Leeds a scrum for an apparent knock on in the tackle.

Immediately after the 35-18 defeat to Smith’s three-time Challenge Cup winners, Leeds coach Brian McDermott called the disallowed try a ‘huge momentum shifter’ and admitted that missed opportunity may have cost his side a chance to get back into the game.

Tony Smith, however, did not agree.

“We sometimes got a few calls, but a few went against us too,” he said.

“You have got to be good enough to overcome it.

“It hurts at the time and we can all throw our hands up, but it depends on what side of the fence you are whether its a good call, bad call or a great call.

“It is easy for us coaches to sit on one side of the fence and say, ‘wow we got a bad call there today’ and I have been guilty of it myself.

“All you can hope as a coach and as a sports fan is that it evens itself out, either over the game, or over the year.

“If I am sitting there after a loss and two or three decisions went against me, I’d probably be doing well to contain my emotions, but that is what you have to do.

“It comes down to this, my job is to get my players good enough to overcome the bad decisions.

“If we are able to do that we can walk away happy.”

There is no question that Smith’s side will be walking away from Wembley extremely pleased themselves after earning their third Challenge Cup title in as many finals.

They ensured Leeds Rhinos became the first team in more than a century to lose three consecutive Challenge Cup finals at Wembley with a stellar second-half performance, scoring four tries through Chris Riley , Ryan Atkins, Tyrone McCarthy and Hodgson to add to first half efforts touched down by Joel Monaghan and Trent Waterhouse.

The win cemented the current Wolves side as one of the best in the club’s history, and captain Adrian Morley believes that lifting the cup for a third time ranks as one of the proudest moments of his illustrious career.

“It is absolutely incredible,” said the Warrington legend, who marked his 150th game for the club at Wembley yesterday, Saturday.

“After the success in 2009 and 2010 we were disappointed not to be here last year and we made it a goal of ours this year to return.

“To win three times in four years is a fantastic achievement and I am so proud to be part of it.”

Comments(12)

akabaz says...
4:11pm Sun 26 Aug 12

I have no complaints about the tackle on Brett Hodgson, if Benny had done the same it would have been a great hit but I am confused as to why Leeds got the scrum, Brett so called knocked on but it is as clear as daylight the ball went backwards the only knock on was by the leeds player and then they were off-side when they collected the ball & went over, so the right decision was made on the no try

exwarringtonian says...
5:30pm Sun 26 Aug 12

I was at Wembley and unless my eyes deceived me after the long deliberation over the incident it came on screen, no try, scrum defence.

Cheap Mower says...
6:29pm Sun 26 Aug 12

I thought the call was the right one, first knock on, leeds scrum. Its their fault if they dont then score from that set close to our line

Paris says...
7:26pm Sun 26 Aug 12

I saw the screen too at Wembley, No try scrum defence, yet the decision went to scrum attack! Don't know why leeds are complaining!

MikeJT says...
8:34am Mon 27 Aug 12

SCRUM DEFENSE because at the time of the FIRST offence (Brett's knock-on) Warrington were coming away from their line with the ball, hence attacking.

exwarringtonian says...
12:42pm Mon 27 Aug 12

MikeJT wrote:
SCRUM DEFENSE because at the time of the FIRST offence (Brett's knock-on) Warrington were coming away from their line with the ball, hence attacking.
Thank you for your reply, I stand corrected.

exwarringtonian says...
12:42pm Mon 27 Aug 12

MikeJT wrote:
SCRUM DEFENSE because at the time of the FIRST offence (Brett's knock-on) Warrington were coming away from their line with the ball, hence attacking.
Thank you for your reply, I stand corrected.

akabaz says...
8:16pm Mon 27 Aug 12

After watching the incident over again, I am sure that Brett did not knock on as the ball went backwards

LIVEWIRE says...
2:26am Tue 28 Aug 12

Personally i did think it was a knock on by brett,what i was disgusted about was jonathan davies saying brett was play acting and deserves an oscar for pretending to be hurt.. wow how many players would of got up from that tackle

Sameoldsameold says...
6:47pm Tue 28 Aug 12

Even Leuleuia admitted the ball was knocked forward , then he says he's not sure what the rules are ???????, correct decision was made, so Rhinos have no gripe, none of this " we don't get decisions" rubbish .

Sameoldsameold says...
6:49pm Tue 28 Aug 12

Even Leuleuia admitted the ball was knocked forward , then he says he's not sure what the rules are ???????, correct decision was made, so Rhinos have no gripe, none of this " we don't get decisions" rubbish .

beaky says...
10:44pm Tue 28 Aug 12

Even if b Bret did knock on Leeds player also knocked it forward . So there is no way they can play advantage after a second foul

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree