Warrington Wolves chief executive fighting for changes to how Super League is run

Warrington Guardian: Gatcliffe is fighting to change the way Super League is run Gatcliffe is fighting to change the way Super League is run

WOLVES’ chief executive Andy Gatcliffe is fighting to change the way Super League is run.

As rugby league in this country undergoes some of the most radical changes since the introduction of Super League in 1996, Gatcliffe believes now is the time to reconsider how the sport’s elite competition is managed.

“At the moment Brian Barwick, the chairman of the Rugby Football League, is also the chairman of Super League, while the CEO of the RFL, Nigel Wood, is also the CEO of the Super League,” he said.

“It is our club’s belief that they have a clash of roles.

“I believe we should have our own CEO and sales, marketing and financial officer who will represent only the Super League clubs.

“This duality of role that the CEO and chairman have in both the RFL and Super League, that is not working.”

Any time the RFL steers the game down a path against the wishes of the majority of Super League clubs, a huge conflict of interest arises.

This issue has been brought to the fore by the recent structure wrangling, but is by no means irrelevant now that the 3x8 league system has been ratified.

“One of the issues we have been kicking back against as a club is this ‘whole sport’ idea from the RFL,” he said.

“Bringing everybody from community game up to Super League under the RFL, all working together, helping each other and all being in the one pot (financially).

“Well I’m sorry, but life is not like that.

“In effect the RFL have this whole sport plan, which I agree with in principle, but they then want us as a club to start funding that.

“So I am saying ‘hang on a minute’ we need to look after those Super League clubs that have their own long-lasting financial issues first and foremost.

“Yes, Super League is the jewel in the crown of rugby league in this country and of course we have to respect all the others, professional or amateur.

“We can give them money, like we are now, but there is a limit to what we can give and that is another debate that needs to happen as well.”

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

4:49pm Sat 8 Feb 14

Bakubrit says...

The voice of reason at last.
Without super league and the money it attracts either from Sky or bums on seats there would be no money to filter down to the lower echilons of our game.
Just look at the attendencies at non super league games and you are lucky to see anything in 4 figures. You cannot sustain any club on those kind of numbers so why should financiallly sustainable clubs like Warrington, Leeds, Wigan et al put their own financial future in doubt to support clubs who cannot manage their own busines.
I am sure I would not put my own company profits into a company that could not manage it's own affairs.
The Wood/Barwick comfortable arrangement is also a real cause for concern and needs resolvng without undue delay. This nepotonic allaince is unique in my experience and should be dissolved with immediate effect.
The voice of reason at last. Without super league and the money it attracts either from Sky or bums on seats there would be no money to filter down to the lower echilons of our game. Just look at the attendencies at non super league games and you are lucky to see anything in 4 figures. You cannot sustain any club on those kind of numbers so why should financiallly sustainable clubs like Warrington, Leeds, Wigan et al put their own financial future in doubt to support clubs who cannot manage their own busines. I am sure I would not put my own company profits into a company that could not manage it's own affairs. The Wood/Barwick comfortable arrangement is also a real cause for concern and needs resolvng without undue delay. This nepotonic allaince is unique in my experience and should be dissolved with immediate effect. Bakubrit
  • Score: 1

2:21pm Sun 9 Feb 14

Wire-Wire says...

Bakubrit wrote:
The voice of reason at last.
Without super league and the money it attracts either from Sky or bums on seats there would be no money to filter down to the lower echilons of our game.
Just look at the attendencies at non super league games and you are lucky to see anything in 4 figures. You cannot sustain any club on those kind of numbers so why should financiallly sustainable clubs like Warrington, Leeds, Wigan et al put their own financial future in doubt to support clubs who cannot manage their own busines.
I am sure I would not put my own company profits into a company that could not manage it's own affairs.
The Wood/Barwick comfortable arrangement is also a real cause for concern and needs resolvng without undue delay. This nepotonic allaince is unique in my experience and should be dissolved with immediate effect.
+1
[quote][p][bold]Bakubrit[/bold] wrote: The voice of reason at last. Without super league and the money it attracts either from Sky or bums on seats there would be no money to filter down to the lower echilons of our game. Just look at the attendencies at non super league games and you are lucky to see anything in 4 figures. You cannot sustain any club on those kind of numbers so why should financiallly sustainable clubs like Warrington, Leeds, Wigan et al put their own financial future in doubt to support clubs who cannot manage their own busines. I am sure I would not put my own company profits into a company that could not manage it's own affairs. The Wood/Barwick comfortable arrangement is also a real cause for concern and needs resolvng without undue delay. This nepotonic allaince is unique in my experience and should be dissolved with immediate effect.[/p][/quote]+1 Wire-Wire
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree