Benefit cheat ordered to pay money back (From Warrington Guardian)
Text us your news! Start your message Warrington News and send any photos or videos to 80360
Padgate benefit cheat ordered to pay money back
10:40am Tuesday 16th October 2012 in News
Padgate benefit cheat ordered to pay money back at Liverpool Crown Court
A BENEFIT cheat who falsely claimed more than £6,000 has been ordered to pay the money back and handed a 120 hour community punishment order.
Lee Gemmell, of Vulcan Close, Padgate, appeared at Liverpool Crown Court on Thursday after failing to notify the council he was living with his partner on Harbord Street.
The 34-year-old was overpaid a total of £6,544 made up of £2,676 of income support, £2,995 of housing benefit and £873 of council tax benefit.
He was also ordered to pay £500 costs to the court.
Adrian Webster, the council’s benefits manager, said: “Deliberately withholding information that affects your claim is stealing. All benefit theft is crime and the council is determined to bring fraudsters to justice.”
Anyone who suspects benefits are being claimed fraudulently should call the council's confidential benefit fraud hotline on 442282 / 442283 or e-mail fraudteam@warrington.gov.uk.
Comments(9)
Nikki Gemmell
says...
5:19pm Tue 16 Oct 12
former girlfriend and current wife of lee gemmell!
richiepooh
says...
7:12am Wed 17 Oct 12
Daz@SankeyviaOrford
says...
8:00am Wed 17 Oct 12
richiepooh
says...
11:00am Wed 17 Oct 12
jitterbug
says...
12:55pm Wed 17 Oct 12
Blah blah blah stop whining accept the fact that benefit cheating occured, pay the fine and struggle with bills like the rest of us have too.
Nikki Gemmell
says...
2:21am Thu 18 Oct 12
use the word fraud again and il do you for slander! no where in this article does it say fraud and the charge was ADMIN ACT. lee claimed these benefits at the start of 2011 when he left work to look after his child full time. he stopped claiming when he moved into my home a year later. so no we wouldnt still be at it as you say if we hadnt been caught!
as a couple we did what most did and i stayed at his a few nights a week at the time i was under the impression this was allowed up to 3 nights a week (take note people this is not) it seems there is a massive grey area on whats right from wrong when having some one stay over. lee never advised the council he was in a relationship and his girlfriend stayed over at the weekend or maybe through the week. lee never benefited from my wage and i didnt contribute to his house hold bills.
In all benefit cases its the amount in question that determines the consequence. so NO pleeding guilty did not get lee a lesser outcome in anyway!
I understand you must have a massive interest in the peoples money and looking after our tax payers so i find it abit hard to believe my dear old richie pooh that in your 1st comment you would condon such an act of dishonesty as you thought we were both on beneifts, so thats ok is it? as long as you on the system you may aswel screw it why your there?
not all these cases are black and white and i fully appreciate such a massive head line will attrack the attention of people. lee admitted to not informing the council which is why he took his punishment and will pay back the money and do the unpaid work ahead of him. it was an act of the unknown not of dishonesty, theft, cheating or trust! which again is alittle pot ketle black coming from a bunch of people who wont use there full name when making such acusations.
it was advised to lee to use this as a learning curve and i hope everybody else does the same if your going to claim benefits make sure your aware of the rules around people staying at your house, like lee you to could be made an example of and find yourself in a similar situation.
dignified lawman
says...
12:31pm Thu 18 Oct 12
also before the keyboard warriors starting picking on people look at the bigger picture , hamza and all these unwelcome asylum seekers screwing us for millions .
Hawaii
says...
12:45am Thu 25 Oct 12
richiepooh says...
11:21am Tue 16 Oct 12
Stupidity of the system is as much to blame.
And the girlfriend he lives with, I assume she is in benefits too?
And while he's doing his community work hr can't be seeking employment which means he will not be able to claim job seekers. So what will he resort to to survive. I better punishment would be an enforced employment with a low salary say £100 a week for two years, at the end he would be accustomed to a working lug , gained skills and be employable.
The system is broke, it's too easy to blame the people in the bottom of the ladder for doing what they can to get by.