Areas of Grand Final could be improved - Gatcliffe (From Warrington Guardian)
Text us your news! Start your message Warrington News and send any photos or videos to 80360
Areas of Grand Final could be improved - Gatcliffe
9:10am Thursday 11th October 2012 in News
“IF at the start of the season you had told me we would win the Challenge Cup, make the Grand Final and finish second in the league, I would have taken it.”
And Warrington Wolves chief executive Andy Gatcliffe is aiming to go one better in 2013.
He said while reaching Old Trafford is not as lucrative for the club as a Wembley appearance, it helps with the Wolves’ standing within the game.
He added: “We get six weeks between the semi final and final for us to sell merchandise and we just don’t get that with the Grand Final.
“We are a business but sometimes it is vital for the standing in the game.
“We have won the Challenge Cup but we have now been to a Grand Final as well, and we won the under 20s.
“How exciting is that for the fans - especially with the World Cup coming next year as well with two games at The Halliwell Jones Stadium.”
But Old Trafford was not a great experience for all fans.
Some ended up in the wrong end of the ground with a number if minor skirmishes breaking out while others complained of drink -fuelled problems caused by a later kick off - 6pm rather than 2.30pm - compared to the Wembley showpiece.
Mr Gatcliffe said: “We have already sent a lengthy e-mail to Super League and the RFL about this.
“We totally agree with the fans that there are areas that could be improved. They have had an interim meetings and there will be a further meeting to follow in November.
“Other clubs now need to follow our lead on this.
“We are committed to making the Grand Final a brilliant family occasion and we will continue to do that.”
Comments(9)
charlybabe
says...
10:50am Thu 11 Oct 12
MikeJT
says...
11:54am Thu 11 Oct 12
1. Move kickoff to the afternoon (but that will depend on SKY and whats the chances of SKY telling Man City to move one of their games for police purposes). Will also reduce drinking times and also allow for fans to head home before transport issues start.
2. Stricter enforcement of sales of alcohol to people who are obviously already drunk.
3. Restrict sales behind the sticks to sales though the qualifying clubs. If Leeds fans ( or for that matter Widnes fans) hadnt purchased tickets via the RFL in the West then some problems would have been avoided.
4. Get the stewarding right. OK, so the football orientated stewards at OT may have been told to ease off a bit for the rugby crowd BUT this doesnt mean ignore stuff which is happening right infront of you, and if you warn somebody about something be prepared to back it up when they ignore you (not, give them another 4 warnings before walking away).
CHADWICK
says...
12:41pm Thu 11 Oct 12
MikeJT wrote:I'll add a number 5. Move it to Wembley.
I said it on the day, and have repeated it since but I felt very "underwhelmed" by the whole GF experience (compare to Wembley, old and new, previous other finals, games V Australia at Wilderspool). My daughter and I came away thinking "we just got beat by Leeds" rather than "OMG we just lost out on the chance of becoming champions". There are many SIMPLE things that can be done to help with the problems at OT. 1. Move kickoff to the afternoon (but that will depend on SKY and whats the chances of SKY telling Man City to move one of their games for police purposes). Will also reduce drinking times and also allow for fans to head home before transport issues start. 2. Stricter enforcement of sales of alcohol to people who are obviously already drunk. 3. Restrict sales behind the sticks to sales though the qualifying clubs. If Leeds fans ( or for that matter Widnes fans) hadnt purchased tickets via the RFL in the West then some problems would have been avoided. 4. Get the stewarding right. OK, so the football orientated stewards at OT may have been told to ease off a bit for the rugby crowd BUT this doesnt mean ignore stuff which is happening right infront of you, and if you warn somebody about something be prepared to back it up when they ignore you (not, give them another 4 warnings before walking away).
akabaz
says...
4:52pm Thu 11 Oct 12
CHADWICK wrote:Wembley is not an option, why should fans of what is a predominatley northern game have to travel to London to be ripped off even more than at OT, the prices that we where charged for a tray of chips (approx 20 chips) £2,50 scandalous, £2.00 to be allowed entry into a pub where we were going to add to their profits absolute scandalous but in wembley the prices where even dearer
MikeJT wrote:I'll add a number 5. Move it to Wembley.
I said it on the day, and have repeated it since but I felt very "underwhelmed" by the whole GF experience (compare to Wembley, old and new, previous other finals, games V Australia at Wilderspool). My daughter and I came away thinking "we just got beat by Leeds" rather than "OMG we just lost out on the chance of becoming champions". There are many SIMPLE things that can be done to help with the problems at OT. 1. Move kickoff to the afternoon (but that will depend on SKY and whats the chances of SKY telling Man City to move one of their games for police purposes). Will also reduce drinking times and also allow for fans to head home before transport issues start. 2. Stricter enforcement of sales of alcohol to people who are obviously already drunk. 3. Restrict sales behind the sticks to sales though the qualifying clubs. If Leeds fans ( or for that matter Widnes fans) hadnt purchased tickets via the RFL in the West then some problems would have been avoided. 4. Get the stewarding right. OK, so the football orientated stewards at OT may have been told to ease off a bit for the rugby crowd BUT this doesnt mean ignore stuff which is happening right infront of you, and if you warn somebody about something be prepared to back it up when they ignore you (not, give them another 4 warnings before walking away).
Casual Postman of Orford
says...
7:22pm Thu 11 Oct 12
Firstly the no beer in the stands policy meant people got lashed up before the game and downed drinks at speed in the concourses. At Wembley beers could be sipped in the seats.
And the RFL sat loads of gangs of Leeds fans in the Wire end where all the fighting was, they should have been segregated.
Hopeful92
says...
7:33am Fri 12 Oct 12
MikeJT
says...
9:43am Fri 12 Oct 12
The biggest problem with the alcohol issue is enforcement. If bars are driven by money, they will serve to anybody. If GMP want drunks confined to inside the stadium (as it makes their job easier) they wont stop them going in (or assist the stewards getting them out).
Hopeful, I understand your comments and genrally speaking agree, BUT you do get alcohol related trouble at rugby games (just ask anybody who's been at the HJ when Featherstone come to town whether its for a cup game V Wolves or for the championship grand finals). The differences there are a) there are fewer spectators so fewer incidents and b) the staff are specifically trained for that type of crowd. Its very unsual to actually have a full police presence at a RL game.
flashcoffy
says...
11:31am Fri 12 Oct 12
The issue is people are using this as an excuse for drunken behaviour, if you get the train 6 hours before the final and drink all day, what does it matter if for 40 minutes per half you cant take a drink to your seat?
flashcoffy says...
9:39am Thu 11 Oct 12