Driver jailed after leaving pedestrian with brain damage

GUILTY: Paul Critchley GUILTY: Paul Critchley

A DRUNK driver who left a pedestrian with serious brain damage after crashing into him in Stockton Heath has been jailed for 16 months.

Warrington Crown Court heard on Monday how Paul Critchley, aged 29, was driving ‘like a man possessed’ after drinking four pints in Thelwall British Legion on March 6 this year.

He was driving back to his home in Church Street, Great Budworth, Northwich, at speeds of between 50 and 60mph when he overtook two cars on London Road.

Prosecuting, John Oates said it was ‘an accident waiting to happen, but this time it did’.

He described how victim Ian Foster and wife Pauline were enjoying an evening walk when they heard the sound of Critchley’s car careering down the road.

She told the Warrington Guardian Ian was one of the ‘fortunate ones’ to survive such a crash.

She added: “Being behind the wheel of two tonnes of metal is real life, not a computer simulation and impacts lives and families for years after.

“Ian was one of the fortunate ones to survive due to the emergency treatment and ongoing intensive care that he received.”

Mr Foster was crossing the 30mph London Road at its junction with Broomfields Road ahead of his wife.

The 49-year-old shouted a warning for her to stop before he was hit by the defendant’s silver Ford Focus.

It struck the father-of-two with enough force to smash the windscreen and flip him completely.

A doctor and nurse were driving the two cars Critchley had overtaken and they stopped to give emergency treatment, the court head.

The IT consultant was rushed to Warrington Hospital with head injuries and a broken leg before being transferred to Walton Neurological Centre in Liverpool.

He was left with serious brain damage. His family now care for him full time.

He suffers short term memory loss and has had to learn to read and brush his teeth again.

He is extremely unlikely to ever return to work, the court heard.

A ‘hysterical’ Critchley was arrested at the scene and was found to have 57 micrograms of alcohol in 100ml of breath. The legal limit is 35.

During his police interview he blamed Mr Foster for the crash.

The defendant claimed to be driving at a normal speed and said he had tried to go around his victim, but that Mr Foster moved the wrong way, the court was told.

Critchley pleaded guilty to dangerous driving and driving with excess alcohol.

He had only been driving for around a year after a previous conviction for dangerous driving.

Judge David Hale said he had caused ‘turmoil, pain and suffering’ to Mr Foster and his family.

He said: “By your criminal actions you’ve done all but ruin a family’s life.

“You were driving like a man possessed for no reason whatsoever.

“You were driving when you’d had a drink, well in excess of the speed limit without regard for anyone else.

“You caused life-changing injuries to Mr Foster.

“He’s the main victim but it goes beyond that.

“It’s a desperately serious situation.

“Cars are lethal weapons driven like this.”

Judge Hale added he had given Critchley the maximum sentence possible.

He was also banned from driving for seven years.

Comments(8)

Chip Hazard says...
9:13am Thu 6 Sep 12

16 month is the maximum sentence for almost destroying this mans life and family? Rediculous!

Cleopatra says...
9:48am Thu 6 Sep 12

16 months for ruining a man's life and that after a previous conviction for dangerous driving. It simply would not be long enough if the sentence was doubled.
Banned from driving for seven years. It should have been a lifelong ban!
This thing has got off too lightly and I think the victim's family should appeal for a much longer sentence!

old-codger says...
11:26am Thu 6 Sep 12

He had only been driving for around a year after a previous conviction for dangerous driving..

Some people never learn,

The mad Barstard should have got 16 year not 16 months, He will be out in 8 months.

drunkennun says...
3:55pm Thu 6 Sep 12

British justice at its best ,
WHAT A JOKE ,,,,,

notatcreamfields says...
5:10pm Thu 6 Sep 12

If he'd attacked him with a hammer he'd have been charged with and probably convicted of attempted murder. A car is a weapon when in the wrong hands in the same way a hammer or a baseball bat is so why don't they get treated the same? I read deaths because of drink driving every week so why have the Government not done anything about it? It's almost as if there's only little if any reason to not drink and drive even if a drink driver like the one in Blackburn last year who killed a child while driving drunk, with no licence, no insurance and not for the first time. While he was a bail he continued to illegally drive, when convicted he carried on and when he was sentenced for causing death by dangerous driving, no licence no insurance, no MOT, leaving the scene of an accident and failure to report an accident he got......... 4 months! I'm sure plenty of you know the one i'm talking about who the UK Border Agency should've deported months before because he was a failed asylum seeker who ran out of all appeal costing Legal aid hundreds of thousands of pounds. After his 2 months the UK Border Agency tried to deport him like they should've in the first place cause he'd gone past the last drink saloon. While in court the Iraq man's solicitor claimed deporting him would breach his human rights cause he's now settled and him and his English girlfriend owns a cat jointly. Yes you read it right a cat! He's still in Blackburn and the childs Father that he killed has to see him all the time. He's since been arrested multiple times more for guess what? Drink driving etc, cars are weapons and the court needs to have the power to recognise that because it's the perfect murder weapon if you want to kill someone cause you'll only get a couple of years and get rid of the person you didn't like and was in your way.

SickAndTired2 says...
6:30pm Thu 6 Sep 12

What an absolute waste of human evolution. Leave it to rot in prison.

notatcreamfields says...
7:40pm Thu 6 Sep 12

SickAndTired2 wrote:
What an absolute waste of human evolution. Leave it to rot in prison.
Omg! Totally agree with you SickAndTired2, gonna have to get my Inspector to refer me to occupational health to see what's wrong with me! Ha ha only messing it's just so irritating how the law doesn't see cars as weapons when in the wrong hands like a hammer can help you fix your fence but in someone else's hands it's an offensive weapon. If we stopped a car and upon searching it found a hammer in the door well or within easy reaching distance from the drivers seat we'd nick him for possession of an offensive weapon unless he or she (cause it's not only men that do it) had an extremely good excuse they'd be taken in cause it's not something any officer would turn a blind eye too because all it takes is for them to have been out drinking, know they're over the limit and if it's just 1 Police officer pulling them over it only takes a split minute for it to turn from a hammer "for work" into something which will cause major injury to anybody who gets on the wrong side of the potential offender

chumhill says...
10:36pm Thu 6 Sep 12

16 months really the maximum he could give, and what complete idiot decided this? who in their right mind can set such a rule. Things like this need to go straight to the top. To intentionally destroy someones life and get 16 months.... words cannot describe how illogical this is. I hope someone destroys this mans life when hes out of prison, bullet between the eyes!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree