Hotel and police camp originally offered in school deal (From Warrington Guardian)
Text us your news! Start your message Warrington News and send any photos or videos to 80360
Fight over Woolston Free School continues
8:32am Thursday 14th June 2012 in News
PADDINGTON House Hotel and the former police training camp in Bruche were offered by the council as potential sites for the new Woolston free school.
But Government officials instead preferred to ‘bully’ officials at Warrington Town Hall into allowing them to use Bruche Infants School before preparing a bid to build a new school on playing fields at Hillock Lane.
A meeting of the education watchdog committee on Wednesday night heard the department for education issued Warrington Borough Council with an ultimatum.
Either alllow the free school to move into Bruche or see them seize the Woolston High School building - which will be empty when the final pupils leave next month - which has been earmarked for special educational needs children.
Clr Colin Froggatt, executive member for education (LAB - Poulton South) told the meeting Government officials had been using Google maps to find a suitable site for the free school.
But he said there would not be enough pupils to make it viable and said head teachers in school outside Woolston had been approached as free school officials look to boost numbers.
He said: “I fought the closure in 2007. But the landscape has changed.
“My children went to Woolston High School and my heart says I would like a high school. But my head says it won’t happen.”
The meeting heard this was a ‘golden opportunity’ to give Warrington the best special educational school in the country.
Under the plans, confirmed earlier this year, pupils from Green Lane and Foxwood would move into Woolston High with work set to start in September.
Clr Sheila Woodyatt, former education boss at the council, (CON Lymm) said the opportunity could not be missed.
“This will give us the best provision in the north west if not the country and our special needs children deserve this,” she said.
The committee agreed to write to the executive to support the decision take last month to accept the free school onto Bruche but to press ahead with plans for the special school at Woolston.
But they asked the committee to urge Government education bosses to back the special school plan.
Comments(14)
AbsoluteZero
says...
12:36pm Thu 14 Jun 12
MikeJT
says...
12:47pm Thu 14 Jun 12
year 6 Parent
says...
8:19am Fri 15 Jun 12
woolston1
says...
12:04pm Fri 15 Jun 12
JWilson1
says...
10:53pm Fri 15 Jun 12
JonnyScotland
says...
12:55am Sun 17 Jun 12
We deserve the WHS site. Foxwood and Green Lane are performing at an Outstanding level says Ofsted so if it isn't broken then WHY try to fix it? - have the council not learnt from past mistakes such as Stockton Heath primary?
toffeeman_4ever
says...
8:12pm Sun 17 Jun 12
Colin Lilypad
says...
9:49pm Sun 17 Jun 12
JWilson1
says...
10:07pm Sun 17 Jun 12
Everybody benefits from inclusion. Schools which fully include disabled and SEN students feel more welcoming, I should know I work in one. Research has demonstrated that SEN students who spend greater time with their mainstream peers show an increase in social skills and academic proficiency. According to professor Bob Jackson there is no research anywhere in the world which shows that special schooling and segregated education produced better outcomes for students with special needs.
I’ve lived in Padgate all my life, at the moment I am a teaching assistant in Halton and I love my job working with a whole range of students, correct me if I’m wrong but this is 2012 right? When you hear these councillors speak you would think we were back in 1912.
silverlady54
says...
12:25pm Tue 19 Jun 12
Colin Lilypad
says...
11:17pm Tue 19 Jun 12
silverlady54
says...
8:36am Wed 20 Jun 12
mac
says...
9:58pm Wed 20 Jun 12
milly269 says...
9:09am Thu 14 Jun 12
I thought Fox Wood was a purpose built facility - a centre of excellence? Is the idea to put all the SEN children in one place, without differentiation for their abilities or needs? Surely the decision should be made in the best interests of the child, not out of spite to prevent the free school having the site?