Padgate man tried to rape dementia patient, 80

Warrington Crown Court Warrington Crown Court

A 28-YEAR-OLD man has been found guilty of attempting to rape an 80-year-old woman with dementia.

Jamie Waterworth, of Elizabeth Drive, Padgate, attack his vulnerable victim on the afternoon of December 24, 2010.

During a week-long trial Warrington Crown Court heard how his victim’s condition had declined to a point where she was no longer able to remember the incident and jurors had to watch a video of an interview filmed the day after the attack.

In it the woman told police, ‘he was trying to make love to me’ and ‘I told him to stop but he wasn’t answering me’.

She also said the attack had left her feeling guilty.

Waterworth had been drinking at 4am on the day of the attack because he had depression and was struggling to sleep. He also had a few sips of neat vodka at lunchtime.

The court heard how after his arrest Waterworth told a police officer, ‘I’m sorry, please forgive me, I’m not a bad lad’.

He had a cut to his head when he was arrested and was taken to Warrington Hospital for treatment. The court heard how he became aggressive and at one point had to be restrained by officers because he was punching himself in the face.

PC David Wynne said: “His mood was very up and down when we first got there. He went through bouts of crying to out of nowhere becoming aggressive, clenching fists and punching walls.”

Waterworth told police in his interview he could not recall the attack but knew he would not commit an act like the one he was accused of.

Simon Christie, defending, also said the woman had a history of hallucinations because of her condition.

He was cleared of a charge of rape on the same woman by the jury when the verdict was given yesterday, Wednesday, afternoon.

Waterworth was remanded in custody and will be sentenced on Friday, June 8.

Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

Comments(10)

Cleopatra says...
10:51am Thu 17 May 12

Lock it up for life, preferable with the long-term hard cases who will find it a pretty boy to bend over!
Dirty, stinking low life!

kreecher says...
11:20am Thu 17 May 12

What a miserable excuse for a human being.
Pathetic, nasty vile creature.

chunkymunky says...
11:56am Thu 17 May 12

I dont actually understand what this report is saying, the title basically says hes guilty but then this is in the story "He was cleared of a charge of rape on the same woman by the jury when the verdict was given yesterday, Wednesday, afternoon" so whats he being sentanced for?

anyone else think it makes no sense?!?!?

denby10 says...
1:51pm Thu 17 May 12

He is being sentenced because there was enough evidence to convict. He intended to commit rape and maybe the judge wanted the jury to consider 2 charges. If the jury couldnt 100% convict on rape then they could consider attempted. Either way it is horrific crime for a person who was put in a position of trust with a vulnerable person.

drunkennun says...
6:44pm Thu 17 May 12

Dirty vile excuse of a man.. Let 's hope he gets what's comming to him from a couple of in mates

Cleopatra says...
7:11pm Thu 17 May 12

It makes perfect sense. The headline says - Padgate man tried to rape dementia patient, 80.
Then it goes on to say he was founf guilty of attempting to rape her.
What is confusing about that?

chunkymunky says...
7:18pm Thu 17 May 12

Apologies, i appear to have misread it first time around, its a very poor reporting sytle!

Chip Hazard says...
9:06pm Thu 17 May 12

chunkymunky wrote:
Apologies, i appear to have misread it first time around, its a very poor reporting sytle!
You should be used to WG poor reporting style by now! I often find myself picking holes and correcting spelling and grammar as I go along.

old-codger says...
9:58pm Mon 21 May 12

A 28-YEAR-OLD man has been found guilty of attempting to rape an 80-year-old woman with dementia. . . . .

The proof of intent to rape was there if not enough to prove rape. Either way he isnt fit to breathe the same air as decent people.

Turnaround says...
4:37pm Wed 23 May 12

Totally disgusted. How can anyone defend this? Oh well, it is because of 'x' or because of 'why'! Crime done, no excuses, get him punished.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree